InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Local Inspection Issues > Florida Inspectors

Notices

Florida Inspectors This is a place for Florida InterNACHI inspectors to discuss Florida inspection topics, wind mitigation inspections and 4-point inspections.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 8/12/10, 12:22 AM
dquigley's Avatar
dquigley dquigley is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vero Beach, Florida
Posts: 833
Please Note: dquigley is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Wind Mit Scenario #2

Test Your Wind Mit Knowledge

Wind Mit Scenario 1 asked how to classify the openings of this home with the garage door having glazing as shown.

Using the same information as posted in Wind Mit Scenario 1 -- This time assume THAT THERE IS NO GLAZING IN THE OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR (even though it is shown in the pictures)
How would you classify the "Opening Protection" ?
Does form 1802 provide a clear choice for this scenario?



facts are as follows:
  • All windows had storm protection in the form of panels. Assume all storm panels had Miami Dade County NOA (9 lbs).
  • The garage door did not have any additional storm protection. Assume garage door is original 1986 construction.
  • The garage door was as per photos (except assume no glazing for this scenario).
  • House was built in 1986



WM #1 info reposted:

Last edited by dquigley; 8/12/10 at 12:30 AM..
Reply With Quote
Need a home inspection in North Dakota? Check out InterNACHI's listing of North Dakota certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine.
  #2  
Old 8/12/10, 12:31 AM
Jay C. Murray's Avatar
Jay C. Murray Jay C. Murray is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Port Saint Lucie, Fl
Posts: 784
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

If I understand your question:

All windows and all other glazed openings are protected with Large missile shutters. The garage door is non rated without the glass I clearly see.

Since the Garage door is not rated, figuring it in would lower the whole, I would mark E.
E. All glazed exterior opening.....

However this may all be pointless, an agent told me that the underwriter(May have been Universal) gives no reduction for anything less than A.



Your Home Inspection & Wind Mitigation Provider
Jay C. Murray
Florida Home & Insurance Inspector Chapter Board Member
Licensed General Contractor & Home Inspector
Serving Port St. Lucie, Ft. Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jensen Beach,
The Palm Beaches, & The Treasure Coast
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8/12/10, 1:12 AM
dquigley's Avatar
dquigley dquigley is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vero Beach, Florida
Posts: 833
Please Note: dquigley is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmurray4 View Post

However this may all be pointless, an agent told me that the underwriter(May have been Universal) gives no reduction for anything less than A.
Anyone else know if this is the case. I would be interested to know.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8/12/10, 6:18 AM
William P. Campbell William P. Campbell is online now
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cape Coral,Fl.
Posts: 78
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

I agree with the E. choice. I think these wind mit senarios are a great idea. Good job Dennis.



Prestige Property Enterprises,Inc
Bill Campbell
Certified Building Contractor
CBC1257312
HI-904
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8/12/10, 7:31 AM
wsiegel wsiegel is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hialeah, Fl
Posts: 2,650
Please Note: wsiegel is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

The correct answer in this case would be I. This door cannot be identified as Miami-Dade or FBC product approved.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8/12/10, 7:43 AM
John Shishilla's Avatar
John Shishilla John Shishilla is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 3,051
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

E. unless you had shutters for the garage, that u could not identify


Discounts are given on 9A or 9B, in my experience, some may even still give credits on 9e or 9f




John Shishilla
State of Florida Licensed Home Inspector #21
Residential Contractor
Accredited Claims Adjuster (ACA)
Mold Assessor MRSA 1544
President of Fl Home & Insurance Inspectors Chptr
VP of Nachi Managment


Serving all of Baytree, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa, Rockledge, Viera, Satellite Beach, Indian Harbor Beach, Indialantic and surrounding areas.

Honor Construction Inspection Service
www.honorconstruction.com
"Because details matter"

321-327-2950

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8/12/10, 7:57 AM
wsiegel wsiegel is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hialeah, Fl
Posts: 2,650
Please Note: wsiegel is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

John,

How can you mark it E when there is no proof of the 9lb missle test on a door that old?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8/12/10, 8:03 AM
Greg Bell's Avatar
Greg Bell Greg Bell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 4,155
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by wsiegel View Post
John,

How can you mark it E when there is no proof of the 9lb missile test on a door that old?
Without the windows the garage door is an unglazed opening.



Greg Bell
Titusville, Fl
02111507

Serving Central Florida
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8/12/10, 9:51 AM
Dennis J. Bonner's Avatar
Dennis J. Bonner Dennis J. Bonner is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deerfield Beach, Florida
Posts: 960
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

not rated, citizens gives credit for this
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8/12/10, 1:11 PM
wsiegel wsiegel is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hialeah, Fl
Posts: 2,650
Please Note: wsiegel is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

Greg,

From what I am reading the ANSI/DASMA115 test did not take effect until 2006.

http://www.dasma.com/PDF/Publication...s/115-2005.pdf

If so, that would mean that a door on a 1986 home would not qualify for an E rating.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 8/12/10, 1:26 PM
Greg Bell's Avatar
Greg Bell Greg Bell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 4,155
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by wsiegel View Post
Greg,

From what I am reading the ANSI/DASMA115 test did not take effect until 2006.

http://www.dasma.com/PDF/Publication...s/115-2005.pdf

If so, that would mean that a door on a 1986 home would not qualify for an E rating.
Hi Bill,

Section E through I only deals with glazed openings. So any door with no glazed (solid) openings would only be considered with section A through D.



Greg Bell
Titusville, Fl
02111507

Serving Central Florida
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 8/12/10, 1:52 PM
wsiegel wsiegel is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hialeah, Fl
Posts: 2,650
Please Note: wsiegel is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

Greg,

My mistake. I agree with you, but the only rating that would then apply would be D. If the door is not rated, that would be the only plausible answer.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 8/12/10, 2:07 PM
Greg Bell's Avatar
Greg Bell Greg Bell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 4,155
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by wsiegel View Post
Greg,

My mistake. I agree with you, but the only rating that would then apply would be D. If the door is not rated, that would be the only plausible answer.
I would not check D because the door is not fully protected. The door has no rating that is listed on the form. But all of the glazed openings have been protected with an approved product. That is why I would select E.

It is my understanding that if you select A, B, C or D then there are no other options that apply. I could be mistaken and welcome others opinions.



Greg Bell
Titusville, Fl
02111507

Serving Central Florida
Reply With Quote
Need a home inspection in North Dakota? Check out InterNACHI's listing of North Dakota certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine.
  #14  
Old 8/12/10, 2:54 PM
Jeff Tatlock's Avatar
Jeff Tatlock Jeff Tatlock is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Satellite Beach, FL
Posts: 219
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

If all the glazed and unglazed openings were fully protected with Large missile - 9lb, 'A' would be the proper choice. Therefore, since the unglazed garage door does not, 'E' would be applicable.

'E' is the same as 'A' (first box - Large missile 9lb) with the exception of unglazed openings. Therefore, choosing 'E' indicates that there are unglazed openings present that do not have verifiable protection.






Jeff T
Licensed Home Inspector, HI-88
www.beachsideinspection.com
www.cocoabeachhomeinspectors.com

Serving all of Brevard County Florida including Cape Canaveral, Merritt Island, Cocoa Beach, Satellite Beach, Indialantic, Indian Harbour Beach, Melborne Beach, Mebourne, Viera, Palm Bay
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 8/13/10, 5:37 PM
dquigley's Avatar
dquigley dquigley is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vero Beach, Florida
Posts: 833
Please Note: dquigley is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Wind Mit Scenario #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtatlock View Post
If all the glazed and unglazed openings were fully protected with Large missile - 9lb, 'A' would be the proper choice. Therefore, since the unglazed garage door does not, 'E' would be applicable.

'E' is the same as 'A' (first box - Large missile 9lb) with the exception of unglazed openings. Therefore, choosing 'E' indicates that there are unglazed openings present that do not have verifiable protection.
Nice descriptive wording
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind Mitigation Certification for Florida rbassett General Inspection Discussion 7 8/17/10 6:19 PM
Wind Mit Scenario 1 dquigley Florida Inspectors 13 8/12/10 12:20 PM
Shooting to begin on comprehensive new roofing courses kshepard Inspection Education & Training 4 11/7/09 2:59 PM
House panel votes to add wind coverage jburkeson1 Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 0 7/28/07 10:45 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 8:43 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts