Here is the email you just sent me Paul:
----- Original Message -----
From: Hinsperger
To: nick.gromicko@nachi.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:02 PM
Subject: Claiming $10,000
Look down at the orginal email.
----- Original Message ----- From: nick gromicko
To: Hinsperger
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: request for post
If I’m going to include your name, why don’t you just post it? I’m lost.
Nick Gromicko
Founder, International Association of Certified Home Inspectors www.nachi.org](http://www.nachi.org/)
Founder, Master Inspector Certification Board, www.certifiedmasterinspector.org
Executive Director, International Association of Certified Indoor Air Consultants, www.iac2.org
Host, NACHI TV, www.nachi.tv
[INDENT]----- Original Message -----
From: Hinsperger
To: nick gromicko
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:26 AM
Subject: Fw: request for post
[FONT=Arial]I haven’t seen it posted yet. Did I miss it or are you not going to post my request?
----- Original Message ----- From: Hinsperger
To: nick gromicko
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: request for post
I would prefer that you do in fact include my name. If you’ll only post it without my name then I guess that will have to do. But I would prefer it included.
[INDENT]----- Original Message -----
From: nick gromicko
To: Hinsperger
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: request for post
If you want me to include your name, why don’t you post it? Or do you mean NOT including your name?
Nick Gromicko
Founder, International Association of Certified Home Inspectors www.nachi.org
Founder, Master Inspector Certification Board, www.certifiedmasterinspector.org
Executive Director, International Association of Certified Indoor Air Consultants, www.iac2.org
Host, NACHI TV, www.nachi.tv
[INDENT]----- Original Message -----
From: Hinsperger
To: gromicko@msn.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:26 PM
Subject: request for post
Nick, as per your offer ( http://www.nachi.org/forum/showpost.php?p=97760&postcount=1 ), I am requesting that you post this for me. Please post everything listed below including my name.
- John Bowman
- Roy Cooke
- Keith Swift
- Raymond Wand
These are names that I, and many, associate with words like Integrity, Professional, Helpful, Loyalty, and ETHICS. Yet these men (and others) have all had run ins with the ESOP committee! Why?
- James Bushart
- Frank Carrio
- Joe Farsetta
These are names that I, and many, would associate with words like quick tempered, emotional, reactive, unprofessional, vulgar and certain by no means ‘ethics’. Yet these men control the ethics committee? Why?
Specific cases aside for a moment, it doesn’t take a genius to see that something is fundamentally wrong here when you compare these two groups of men.
Personally, I don’t think the issue is as much about one member who may, or may not have broken some rule as it is about a rouge committee with no accountability cracking the whip harder and faster when it pertains to protecting one of their own.
Paul Hinsperger
[/INDENT][/INDENT][/FONT]
[/INDENT]