**
Dave.Bottoms**
155 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 12:32:51 http://www.abc4.com/local_news/local_headlines/story.aspx?content_id=00544C93-0332-4CA0-ADD0-88479DC7CBF5
**12-year old boy becomes certified home inspector
**LAST UPDATE: 6/29/2006 4:52:55 PM
Casey Larsen is one of Utah’s certified home inspectors; he is also still in junior high.
Larsen became a qualified home inspector after passing two online tests posted by a company called Nachi, where individuals can pay a small fee, take a simple test, and then, be registered online as an available inspector.
In Utah, there are no regulations that home inspectors must meet, and that worries several Utah home buyers who turn to inspectors for a final peace of mind before purchasing a home.
Casey’s father, Fred Larsen, a more experienced home inspector who is accredited by a well respected organization, says it’s giving people in his industry a bad name.
“It’s an area they can go in and target people that want to get into their own businesses,” he says. “It’s a travesty.”
Everything Casey needed to know to pass the online test, he read in a small book and learned in his school sciences classes. Right now Casey’s gold accredited certificate isn’t being used, so he can concentrate being a 12 year-old for awhile.
**[Raymond.Wand](http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:openWindow3%28%27pop_profile.asp?mode=display&id=2038%27%29)**
574 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 14:13:25 So we have a father fraudulently using his son to justify the fathers agenda and instilling in his son that lying is okay? Perhaps the school board and the Childrens Aid Society should be called into invesitage what surely is a father who thinks its okay to use his son in deceitful activities.
Just another view.
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON **
49 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 16:42:26 Ray,
Deception can work both ways. I’d say the guy used his son to and try prove a point…and maybe he’ll succeed…it’s being/was commented on, for and against, on both this and the Canuck forum that I know of, and who knows maybe state side too. Besides how do we know there was deception on the father’s part?
Maybe the kid was truthfull and NACHI accepted him anyway. Is anyone in tight enough with Nick that he would tell? I doubt it.
As you say…Just another view.
Cheers
Wayne Christopher RHI http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif **
155 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 17:15:23 [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica][size=1]quote:Originally posted by Raymond.Wand
So we have a father fraudulently using his son to justify the fathers agenda and instilling in his son that lying is okay? Perhaps the school board and the Childrens Aid Society should be called into invesitage what surely is a father who thinks its okay to use his son in deceitful activities.
Just another view.
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON
LOL… now that’s gotta be the most ridiculous excuse I’ve ever heard for anything, EVER! I had to pick my arse up off the floor after reading that one. Man, you must have gotten the delux scrub and wax when you went through Nick’s online 24-hour drive-through brainwash.
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_smile_wink.gif
Thanks for the laugh, have a nice weekend.
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_smile_big.gif
[/size][/FONT] Edited by - Dave.Bottoms on 06/30/2006 20:32:52 http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif **
574 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 17:38:04 Wayne,
Yes it is generating much debate. But on the other hand just because someone did or did not pass a test is no assurance of quality or an assurance of competence. Just as there are good Engineers there are also bad ones, either ethically bankrupt or incompetent. So to do we find the same concerns with home inspectors. Ashi has them, Oahi has them, Nachi has them, BCIPI has them…
Turns out the father is a P2P franchise, maybe another clever marketing scheme by P2P eh?
This story sends a very strong message as to why licencing is the only answer. But even then there is no assurance of competence in the field only that all meet the lowest common denominator on a test.
Regards,
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif **
155 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 18:22:39 [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica][size=1]quote:Originally posted by Raymond.Wand
This story sends a very strong message as to why licencing is the only answer. But even then there is no assurance of competence in the field only that all meet the lowest common denominator on a test.
Regards,
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON
Or simply banning NACHI from watering down the profession here in Canada. That would do the trick also. I do agree, however, that NACHI represents the lowest common denominator.
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_smile_big.gif
[/size][/FONT] http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif
155 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 19:03:45 Just think Ray, you can now say you share the same professional home inspector accreditation as a 12-yr-old from Utah. I bet you’ll both be the talk of the playground come recess time. LOL, LOL, LOL…
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_smile_big.gif
Edited by - Dave.Bottoms on 06/30/2006 19:04:17 [http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif](http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=297#top)
574 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 19:28:51 I thought this maybe of interest.
Professional certification -
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A professional certification, trade certification, or professional designation often called simply certification or qualification is a designation earned by a person to certify that he is qualified to perform a job. Certification indicates that the individual has a specific set of knowledge, skills, or abilitiesin the view of the certifying body. Professional certifications are awarded by professional bodies and corporations. The difference between licensure and certification is licensure is required by law, whereas certification is generally voluntary. Sometimes the word certification is used for licensure.
People become certified through training and/or passing an exam. Individuals often advertise their status by appending the certification abbreviation to their name (e.g. “Jane Doe, RHCE”). Strictly speaking, most certifications do not grant post-nominals and it is usually the professional certifications that do.
Certifications may be perpetual, may need to be renewed periodically, or may be valid for a specific period of time (e.g. the life-time of the product upon which the individual is certified). Although it is more common in regard to licensure, sometimes as part or whole of the renewal of an individual’s certification, the individual must show evidence of continual learning — often termed continuing education — or earning continuing education units (CEU).
Certifications are offered through a certification body. This is usually a business organization, and sometimes a professional body. Sometimes, the organization’s business is directly related to the certification, as in a software firm that certifies individuals as competent to use its products. In other cases, an organization (often a not-for-profit organization) exists wholly, or in large part, to offer a particular certification. Whatever its nature, the certifying body determines the policies of the certification program. Potential consumers of a certification wish to understand the nature of the certifying body and the certification process. An individual who bears a designation but appears unable to perform competently is said to be a paper tiger because their resume suggests that they are more effective than they actually are.
Certifications are very common in industry, and in particular the computer industry.
above is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_certification
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif **
574 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 19:52:44 Fwiw and just to be factual.
Today ABC4 voluntarily chose to pull the story and remove it from their website.
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif **
155 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 20:30:01 [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica][size=1]quote:Originally posted by Raymond.Wand
Fwiw and just to be factual.
Today ABC4 voluntarily chose to pull the story and remove it from their website.
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON
LOL… yeah, voluntary. That means Nick threatened them with one of his infamous lawsuits. He’s done it so often that everyone expects a story to get hidden within a few days of its release. Scaring people into hiding the truth doesn’t change the truth.
Nick can make them pull the story, but he can’t change the fact that children can get certified as professional home inspectors with his company. And neither can your encyclopedia definitions, so give it a rest.
Hey, do you remember when Arnold the pig from “Green Acres” got certified by NACHI? Or how about that investigative reporter who stated, clearly, that he knew NOTHING about inspecting houses? Or that dog, remember when he got certified? You and your Boss down south keep some good company Ray. Best of luck helping Nick get rich.
I’m still laughing at your first excuse. Again, have a good weekend.[/size][/FONT] http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_go_up.gif
574 Posts
http://www.oahi.com/members/cafe/icon_posticon.gif
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 20:58:30 Do I detect a note of sourness or sarcasm? I thought this was going to be an informative discussion with factual info, instead you seem to want to lower the level.
Your statement that I am making Nick rich has no bearing on any of this and your statement is unfounded as are the other comments which are subjective.
Raymond Wand RHI/CHI
Alton, ON