Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > >

Notices

California Home Inspectors This is a place for California InterNACHI inspectors to discuss California home inspection topics. Become a home inspector in California

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12/15/18, 4:09 PM
Ian W. Mayer, CMI's Avatar
Ian W. Mayer, CMI Ian W. Mayer, CMI is online now
Certified Master Inspector ®
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,219
Default Good News for California Inspectors

For years inspectors have asked and debated on this forum (and others) about just what happens with an inspection report when a home falls out of escrow.

The California Association of Realtors December 2018 revision of the California Residential Purchase Agreement makes it clear, and the revision gives home inspectors a boost.

In short:
A seller has to disclose previous reports to the buyer
The buyer has to sign a Receipt for Reports that acknowledges the new buyer cannot hold the previous inspector liable for errors.

C.A.R. is actively encouraging buyers to always get their own inspections!

Read More:
Previous Home Inspection Reports - IM Home Inspection
Reply With Quote
Need a home inspection in Missouri? Check out InterNACHI's listing of Missouri certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine.
  #2  
Old 12/15/18, 4:23 PM
Roy D. Cooke, Sr's Avatar
Roy D. Cooke, Sr Roy D. Cooke, Sr is offline
Certified Professional Inspector (CPI) ®
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, ON
Posts: 27,529
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Ian Mayer


Interesting Info thanks for posting this ... Roy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12/15/18, 5:57 PM
Stephen W. Stanczyk's Avatar
Stephen W. Stanczyk Stephen W. Stanczyk is online now
Certified Professional Inspector (CPI)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kapowsin, WA
Posts: 10,613
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

It will be interesting since the court denied that Inspectors could use a "lack of privity" as a defense and could not create that defense through contractual language. There is no seeming defense for negligence.


Now this language in the Purchase & Sales agreement may protect the seller / agent, but I'm not too sure it is written in stone that it protects the inspector. Of course in litigation central California, it may not be long before this is tested.


I sure hope it stands up. That may very well change the inspection industry in California.




Stephen Stanczyk
Washington State Licensed Home Inspector # 221
InterNACHI Lifetime Member

RETIRED

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12/15/18, 6:13 PM
Ian W. Mayer, CMI's Avatar
Ian W. Mayer, CMI Ian W. Mayer, CMI is online now
Certified Master Inspector ®
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,219
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

It is true language in the purchase contract does not make this actual law. I will not claim to know how a court would actually view this revision if it came down to it.

But it is nice to see CAR (The California Association of Realtors) throw inspectors a bone and at least inform home buyers the importance of getting their OWN inspection, and take a stand against reusing inspection reports.

As many jobs as I've gotten from people reading my reports on homes where a buyer didn't close, I also occasionally lose deals when a client cancels because the seller gave them an old report that the buyer considers that "good enough".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12/15/18, 6:54 PM
Dave Fetty, CMI's Avatar
Dave Fetty, CMI Dave Fetty, CMI is online now
Certified Master Inspector ®
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Naples all SWFL
Posts: 12,118
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Interesting, thanks Ian!




Dave Fetty Certified Master Inspector
Florida Home Inspection And Property Services LLC
www.FHIAPS.COM
www.NaplesBestInspector.com
www.FortMyersInspector.com
Naples, Marco Island, Ft. Myers, Bonita Springs, Estero, Cape Coral
Dfetty@FHIAPS.COM
http://https://www.facebook.com/pages/Flori...2450912?ref=hl
Florida Radon Measurement Technician R2547
(239)339-7380
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12/16/18, 4:51 PM
Gary D. Rowden Gary D. Rowden is offline
Certified Professional Inspector (CPI)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hemet, CA
Posts: 850
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Thanks Ian this looks interesting, and by the way I like how you added it to your website, great job….
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12/20/18, 11:12 AM
Mike Hazelwood, CMI's Avatar
Mike Hazelwood, CMI Mike Hazelwood, CMI is offline
Certified Master Inspector (CMI)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 812
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

There has already been a case here in Cali in the last year or two where a buyer successfully sued an inspector over a report that was not performed for them (they were not the client and no signed agreement). They used a report performed for a different client. A precedent has been set unfortunately....




Mike Hazelwood
P.O. Box 6494
Bakersfield, California 93386
calpro@calproinspections.com
www.calproinspections.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12/26/18, 9:14 AM
Jeffrey R. Pope, CMI's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope, CMI Jeffrey R. Pope, CMI is offline
Certified Master Inspector ®
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 15,583
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhazelwood View Post
There has already been a case here in Cali in the last year or two where a buyer successfully sued an inspector over a report that was not performed for them (they were not the client and no signed agreement). They used a report performed for a different client. A precedent has been set unfortunately....
The language and intent of this new addendum is to protect the member-agents (Realtors). It has no real affect on the liability of the inspector.

This is essentially a “warning” to the parties that if they rely on an inspection they did not pay/contract for, they MAY not have legal recourse should an issue arise after the sale. There are a number of reasons why they (the client) would not have legal recourse and any buyer is well advised to have their own inspection(s) performed regardless of any existing reports.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®

Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
(661) 212-0738
Los Angeles, Santa Clarita & Antelope Valley CA
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12/26/18, 11:57 AM
Gary D. Rowden Gary D. Rowden is offline
Certified Professional Inspector (CPI)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hemet, CA
Posts: 850
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpope View Post
The language and intent of this new addendum is to protect the member-agents (Realtors). It has no real affect on the liability of the inspector.

This is essentially a “warning” to the parties that if they rely on an inspection they did not pay/contract for, they MAY not have legal recourse should an issue arise after the sale. There are a number of reasons why they (the client) would not have legal recourse and any buyer is well advised to have their own inspection(s) performed regardless of any existing reports.
I wonder would this increase pre listing home inspections for sellers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12/27/18, 10:24 AM
Ian W. Mayer, CMI's Avatar
Ian W. Mayer, CMI Ian W. Mayer, CMI is online now
Certified Master Inspector ®
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,219
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Jeff Pope is, of course, quite correct.

I still say it is good news that CAR is at least encouraging buyers to get their own inspections and not rely on whatever.

It also subtlety encourages comparing inspection reports, which just maybe will encourage a few people to realize just how bad the minimalist, "do the job quickly" inspectors are.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12/27/18, 11:30 AM
Jeffrey R. Pope, CMI's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope, CMI Jeffrey R. Pope, CMI is offline
Certified Master Inspector ®
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 15,583
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by imayer View Post
I still say it is good news that CAR is at least encouraging buyers to get their own inspections and not rely on whatever.
Absolutely. It also puts a “bug in their brain” in the event they do think about suing an inspector for a service they didn’t pay for. They’re put on notice that it may be an uphill battle. Every roadblock provided in that respect is a welcomed effort.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®

Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
(661) 212-0738
Los Angeles, Santa Clarita & Antelope Valley CA
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12/31/18, 6:16 PM
Nick Gromicko, CMI's Avatar
Nick Gromicko, CMI Nick Gromicko, CMI is online now
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nederland, Colorado
Posts: 64,464
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Quote:
There has already been a case here in Cali in the last year or two where a buyer successfully sued an inspector over a report that was not performed for them (they were not the client and no signed agreement). They used a report performed for a different client. A precedent has been set unfortunately....
I'm quite certain you are incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12/31/18, 11:32 PM
Stephen W. Stanczyk's Avatar
Stephen W. Stanczyk Stephen W. Stanczyk is online now
Certified Professional Inspector (CPI)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kapowsin, WA
Posts: 10,613
Default Re: Good News for California Inspectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by gromicko View Post
I'm quite certain you are incorrect.
It was probably based on the Leko decision and is quite possible since there is case law on the books.




Stephen Stanczyk
Washington State Licensed Home Inspector # 221
InterNACHI Lifetime Member

RETIRED

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 6:43 PM.
no new posts