In this free InterNACHI® webinar with Certified Professional Inspector Dirk Houglum, along with Ken Perkins, Jim Peterson, and Joe Agate, for an in-depth look at international inspection standards. Explore key differences in procedures, regulatory bodies, and reporting styles between the US and UK. Learn how global insights can enhance your professional credibility, refine your inspection approach, and grow your business in the US market.
| Webinar summary for Free Webinar: Key Differences Between US & UK Inspections (04/17/2026) | |
Quick recapThis webinar featured a discussion between CMI Dirk, CPI Jim, and special guest Joe from the UK about differences between home inspections in the United States and the UK. Joe explained that in the UK, gas inspections are mandatory every 12 months for rental properties, but home inspections are not commonly requested during the buying process, unlike in the US where inspections are more standard practice. The discussion highlighted significant safety concerns in UK properties, including outdated buildings and lack of regular inspections, with Joe noting that many unsafe gas appliances go undetected until serious problems arise. The participants compared their different approaches to finding and addressing safety issues, with US inspectors often being able to communicate directly with clients about risks while UK professionals must follow more regulated procedures. The conversation also covered continuing education requirements, with Joe explaining the UK's 5-year retraining system for gas engineers compared to the US's biennial International membership requirements. SummaryUS-UK Home Inspection DifferencesThe webinar discussed key differences between home inspections in the United States and the United Kingdom. Joe from the UK explained that gas inspections are mandatory every 12 months for rental properties in the UK, but homeowners are not required to inspect their gas installations, leading to safety concerns. He noted that many older buildings in the UK lack proper inspections, and while the process is highly regulated, there are fewer third-party educational opportunities compared to organizations like International in the US. The discussion highlighted safety risks, including unsafe gas appliances and electrical issues that may go unaddressed in UK homes. Property Inspection Safety PracticesDirk and Jim discussed their respective practices when encountering unsafe conditions during property inspections. Dirk explained that as a gas inspector, they use "do not use" stickers and create job sheets categorizing risks as at-risk, immediate danger, or carbon monoxide issues, leaving paperwork on site. Jim noted that as a home inspector, they follow international standards and communicate directly with clients about risks, but don't red-tag properties due to their private role. They shared examples of dangerous situations they've encountered, including a significant gas leak in Minnesota and a backdrafting exhaust system issue in a vacant house. UK Gas Inspection Safety DiscussionDirk discussed the importance of regular gas inspections in the UK, highlighting how many safety defects go unnoticed without proper checks. He explained how their team conducts 4-6 daily inspections and uses tools like combustion analyzers to detect carbon monoxide leaks. Jim asked about the potential impact of widespread home inspections on UK housing stock, comparing it to the experience in the US where regular inspections have improved safety over decades. The discussion emphasized the critical role of inspections in identifying and addressing safety issues before they become severe problems. US-UK Home Inspection DifferencesThe group discussed differences between home inspections in the US and the UK, with Dirk explaining that cultural differences in property transactions lead to fewer comprehensive inspections in the US. Dirk shared an example of a property issue that would have been missed without proper inspection, where missing gutters caused water damage and render cracking. Jim suggested that differences in the roles of real estate professionals between the US and UK might contribute to these inspection gaps, noting that US realtors can write legal documents while UK lawyers handle more paperwork-focused tasks. UK House Sale Process DiscussionDirk discussed the lengthy house sale process in the UK, which can take up to 6 months even with cash buyers and proper documentation. He highlighted the peculiar practice of homebuyers waiting until after purchase to conduct inspections, rather than doing so before making offers. Ken shared his experience with quick cash deals and emphasized the importance of home inspections, noting that only about 72% of people get them, particularly recommending them for first-time buyers. The discussion concluded with a brief mention of warranty maintenance and preventative measures in home services. Florida Home Inspections DiscussionKen shared that approximately 40% of his business consists of repeat clients in Florida, where homeowners insurance can be challenging to maintain, leading to frequent re-inspections. The group discussed the benefits of regular home inspections, particularly in Florida's climate, where early detection of issues like roof damage or gas pipe problems can prevent costly repairs. Jim mentioned using Apple AirTags to locate leaks in attics and on roofs, which helps with precise measurements during inspections. Home Inspection Safety DiscussionThe meeting focused on a discussion about home inspections and safety assessments. Jim explained the limitations of city inspections, noting they often miss significant issues that can cost homeowners $60,000-$80,000 to fix. Ken discussed the previous shortcomings of FHA inspections, which were previously limited to a few hours of training, but noted improvements have been made since the 2006-2007 real estate crisis. The group explored the relationship between home inspectors and specialized trade professionals, with Dirk suggesting that home inspectors could potentially handle some specialized inspections to save clients money, though they acknowledged the subjective nature of some assessments compared to more objective gas leak detection. |